|
The Book of Plays (full title in original spelling The Bocke of Plaies and Notes therof p formans for Common Pollicie) is a section of a manuscript by the London astrologer Simon Forman that records his descriptions of four plays he attended in 1610-11 and the morals he drew from them. It is now in the Bodleian Library catalogued as MS Ashmole 208.〔J. H. P. Pafford, "Simon Forman's Bocke of Plaies" in ''Review of English Studies'' New Series 10 (Aug. 1959), 289-91.〕 The document is noteworthy for being the only preserved eyewitness accounts of Shakespeare’s plays on the professional stage during his lifetime: ''Macbeth'' at the Globe Theatre on 20 April 1610;〔Scholars, critics, and editors usually assume that this "1610" is a mistake for "1611," and that the whole of the ''Book of Plays'' most likely dates from that year. See: E.K. Chambers, ''William Shakespeare,'' Oxford: Oxford UP, 1930, 2: 337.〕 ''The Winter's Tale'' at the Globe on 15 May 1611; and ''Cymbeline,'' date and theatre not specified. The fourth play described by Forman is a ''Richard II'' acted at the Globe on 30 April 1611; but from its description it covered the king’s earlier reign, and so was not Shakespeare's ''Richard II'', first published 14 years earlier. The notes were discovered in Forman’s extensive papers in or before 1832 by Philip Bliss or William H. Black. Joseph Hunter mentioned that Bliss had drawn his attention to them in the summer of 1832, and Black noted them on a proof-sheet of his catalogue of the Ashmole manuscripts.〔Pafford, 289-90.〕 ==Suspicions of forgery== The description of ''MacBeth'' mentions characters "Ridinge", a detail that critics with a knowledge of Jacobean dramaturgy and stagecraft had found startling,〔Scragg, Leah. "MacBeth on Horseback" in ''Shakespeare Survey'' 26 (1973), 81-88; 86.〕 although subsequent scholars, commenting on a horse evidently present on stage in another play, have opined that it is within the realm of possibility.〔Weiss, Lawrence. ''Thomas of Woodstock''. ("Egan vs. Elliott and Valenza" ). Online summary report. 29 Aug. 2011. SHAKSPER: The Global Electronic Shakespeare Conference. P. 11, n. 20.〕 Also the idea that Forman, a worldly-wise and canny operator, would spend his time drawing sententious morals from the stage plays he saw struck some modern critics as psychologically false, and in the 20th century suspicion emerged that the ''Book of Plays'' was one of John Payne Collier's forgeries, although Collier, who announced his discovery of the document in 1836, claimed to have used a transcription made for him by an unnamed "gentleman" (identified in 1841 by James Halliwell as W() H. Black, who catalogued the Ashmolean Collection).〔Kassell, Lauren. ''Medicine and Magic in Elizabethan London: Simon Forman, Astrologer, Alchemist, and Physician'', Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005: 2, n10.〕 In 1933 Samuel A. Tannenbaum published an elaborate case arguing that the section was a forgery. Much of Tannenbaum's case centered on palaeographic arguments about the manuscript's handwriting.〔Samuel A. Tannenbaum, ''Shakspearian Scraps and Other Elizabethan Fragments,'' New York: Columbia UP, 1933.〕 An earlier examiner of the manuscript had transcribed the section title as "A Book of Places", and Tannenbaum theorised that the section originally contained descriptions of places in England that Forman had visited and that Collier had altered the title and either inserted forged leaves or had chemically removed the ink for his forgeries. However, subsequent scholars examined the leaves under ultraviolet light and found no trace of forgery or rebinding. In 1945, W. W. Greg criticised Tannenbaum's scholarship and J. Dover Wilson and R. W. Hunt both examined the manuscript without finding any evidence of tampering. It was also learned that Tannebaum, who had not examined the manuscript but relied instead on photostats, had compared the section with writing Forman had done ten years earlier instead of using a control from the same period. Finally, the record Halliwell had found identifying Black as the librarian that had made a transcript of the Forman manuscript for Collier in 1832 was rediscovered, confirming that Collier never had access to the manuscript.〔Altick, Richard D. ''The Scholar Adventurers'', Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1950, 1987: 155-159; Wilson, J. Dover, and R. W. Hunt. "The Authenticity of Simon Forman's Bocke of Plaies" in ''Review of English Studies'' 23 (July 1947), 193-200; Halliday, F. E.. ''A Shakespeare Companion 1564-1964,'' Baltimore: Penguin, 1964: 109, 173.〕 Most modern scholars accept the section as authentic,〔Schoenbaum, S. ''William Shakespeare: Records and Images'', New York: Oxford UP, 1981, pp. 16, 20; Scragg, 81, 88.〕 but some still suspect it might be a forgery.〔Wagner, John A., ''Voices of Shakespeare's England: Contemporary Accounts of Elizabethan Daily Life'', pg 143., Greenwood Publishing, 2010.〕 Katherine Duncan-Jones, for example, did not use it as a source for her biography of Shakespeare, finding it "strangely suspicious that Forman, who nowhere else in his copious papers reveals any interest in the theatre, should suddenly have taken to playgoing in the last year of his life",〔Duncan-Jones, Katherine. ''Ungentle Shakespeare: Scenes From His Life,'' London: Arden Shakespeare 2001: xii-xiii, 289.〕 apparently unaware that Forman does reveal an interest in theatre elsewhere in the manuscripts.〔Riggs, David. Review in ''Shakespeare Quarterly'' 53 (Winter 2002), 550-3; 551.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Book of Plays」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|